finally, this result could be wrong. as it should be. science should never be…
This is a AI post classified by Jev as AI research (research), kept by the AI Radar because it carries real work, not commentary.
finally, this result could be wrong. as it should be. science should never be single-player. if it's wrong, you can check our results on the graph, tell us, correct the mistake, and build on other's people work to solve the Riemann Hypothesis. all you need to do is authenticate flywheel to your preferred model: https://docs.flywheel.paradigma.inc/tutorial
Posted by tensorqt (5.7k followers) 2 days ago · 18 likes · 1k views · view the original post on X. Kept by the AI Radar as AI research. Tools mentioned: Flywheel Docs.
More AI work like this
- SoupFold from KAIST: no single co-folding model wins everywhere, so learn simple… — @biogerontology
- We built AI that actually knows aging biology. Longevity-LLM (9B params) beats OpenAI… — @biogerontology
- We need more examples like this in the open-source RL ecosystem — @adithya_s_k
- "Verbalizing Subliminal Learning Effects Using Text Optimization" — @askalphaxiv
- “What Does Privileged Information Add to On-Policy Self-Distillation?” — @askalphaxiv
- “Score Centering Stabilizes Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning” — @askalphaxiv
- Banger paper from Google Cloud AI Research. — @dair_ai
- If you liked the MiMo-V2.6 livestreamed RL run, don’t forget to check out Marin’s… — @adi_baradwaj
Every post is read and classified by Jev (TypeSafe): what it is, which market it belongs to, and whether the link is a real tool. 27.3k posts from 4.8k X accounts over the last 14 days, 1.2k tools, 19 markets. Collected every 5 minutes, fully re-ranked every hour — last update 2026-09-19 19:27 UTC. Full method.