Mimo 2.6 Pro vs 2.6 Flash Pagoda.
This is a AI post classified by Jev as Frontier models (a model release), kept by the AI Radar because it carries real work, not commentary.
Mimo 2.6 Pro vs 2.6 Flash Pagoda. Both built at max thinking level: - Pro (left): 10M tokens, cost 1.41$ Time 4927s - Flash (right): 6.9M tokens, cost 0.15$ Time 4090s Here the winner is clearly Pro for more completeness, but Flash is really good too! No?
Posted by Ivan Fioravanti (42.9k followers) 1 h ago · 73 likes · 3.7k views · view the original post on X. Kept by the AI Radar as Frontier models.
More AI work like this
- Similar to MiMo if you wanna generate synthetic coding RL environments from GitHub at… — @adithya_s_k
- New open frontier model! MiMo-V2.6 Pro lands on the Intelligence-vs.-Cost-per-Task… — @omarsar0
- Qwen4 announcement — @davidarngar
- Open source AI just got within 1 point of a leading closed model — @hasantoxr
- 🚨 OPUS 5.5 Officially Drops today — @Mr_Salio
- 今天结束了，看完发布会，这次 Qwen 发布了不少新模型，但更值得关注的是，它正在形成一套从模型训练、推理优化到芯片协同的完整研发体系。 — @dingyi
- Introducing JevBench: — @AdamHoltererer
- Azure暴露了GPT-6的最新模型。这次有sol、luna、astra-minor（astra低配版本） — @mylifcc
Every post is read and classified by Jev (TypeSafe): what it is, which market it belongs to, and whether the link is a real tool. 41.7k posts from 5k X accounts over the last 14 days, 1.7k tools, 19 markets. Collected every 5 minutes, fully re-ranked every hour — last update 2026-09-22 14:48 UTC. Full method.