Benchmarks GPT-6 Sol & Luna:
This is a AI post classified by Jev as Frontier models (a model release), kept by the AI Radar because it carries real work, not commentary.
Benchmarks GPT-6 Sol & Luna: • FrontierCode: 48.4% vs. Fable 5.1’s 48.7%, both at xhigh. $1.37 vs. $9.27 per task, roughly 85% cheaper. • DeepSWE: 68.8% at max vs. Fable 5’s best result of 69.9% at xhigh. $2.74 vs. $13.41 per task, roughly 80% cheaper. • AutomationBench: 33.2% at xhigh vs. Fable 5.1 with Opus 5 fallback at 31.4% on max. $0.27 vs. at least $2.45 per task. GPT-6 Luna: • DeepSWE: 66.6% at max vs. Fable 5’s 65.4% at medium. $0.22 vs. $6.09 per task, roughly 96% cheaper. API pricing per million input/output tokens: • Sol: $2 / $10 • Luna: $0.10 / $0.50
Posted by Chubby♨️ (145.6k followers) 1 h ago · 511 likes · 43k views · view the original post on X. Kept by the AI Radar as Frontier models.
More AI work like this
- .@AnthropicAI just shipped Claude Opus 5.5! — @merge_api
- Well, Opus 5.5 failed this test — @literallydenis
- 给大家带来claude opus 5.5 的前端测试结果. 直接说结论, 我怀疑现在opus 5.5就是 fable 5.1 的量化版或者自家蒸馏版, 可以直接看我的视频,… — @karminski3
- Anthropic Launches Claude Opus 5.5 With Fable-Level Performance at a Lower Price… — @MacRumors
- This week’s model drop just rewrote the leaderboard. — @StatsWire
- Use GPT-6 Sol and Luna with AI SDK — @aisdk
- AA benchmark has to be a joke at this point — @haider1
- NO MORE EM-DASHES — @vikktorrrre
Every post is read and classified by Jev (TypeSafe): what it is, which market it belongs to, and whether the link is a real tool. 42.9k posts from 5k X accounts over the last 14 days, 1.8k tools, 19 markets. Collected every 5 minutes, fully re-ranked every hour — last update 2026-09-22 19:32 UTC. Full method.