tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same…
This is a AI post classified by Jev as Frontier models (an opinion), kept by the AI Radar because it carries real work, not commentary.
Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 astra tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same devin harness: > opus took 2 hours 10 mins and cost $75 > astra took 1 hour 25 mins and cost $61 opus 5.5 attention to details is on point, it took time to make everything perfect as i wanted but still super slow and ended up costing way more then astra which one did better here?
Posted by J A Z I I (9.9k followers) 1 h ago · 53 likes · 4.6k views · view the original post on X. Kept by the AI Radar as Frontier models. Tools mentioned: Claude.
More AI work like this
- if you’re using opus 5.5, steal this prompt... — @Av1dlive
- Claude Opus 5.5 system card: — @rohanpaul_ai
- anthropic won big today — @notjazii
- One launch deal for 5 new models. — @RespanAI
- Claude Opus 5.5 on Higgsfield turned one house photo and its floor plans into a full 3D… — @higgsfield_ai
- A quick recap of what we saw today, and an answer to the question of whether there was a… — @kimmonismus
- Grok 4.7 (xHigh) by @SpaceXAI just landed at #10 in Code Arena: WebDev with 1632 pts. — @arena
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. — @higgsfield_ai
Every post is read and classified by Jev (TypeSafe): what it is, which market it belongs to, and whether the link is a real tool. 43.1k posts from 5k X accounts over the last 14 days, 1.8k tools, 19 markets. Collected every 5 minutes, fully re-ranked every hour — last update 2026-09-22 20:50 UTC. Full method.