Hy-4 versus Deepseek Flash crab on the beach test.
This is a AI post classified by AGK Intelligence as Frontier models (a model release), kept by the AI Radar because it carries real work, not commentary.
Hy-4 versus Deepseek Flash crab on the beach test. Hy-4 is definitely more efficient however the out lags just a bit against Deepseek in this example. Deepseek is 552b vs Hy-4's 780b for visual and game related output so far Deepseek st still king.
Posted by Loktar 🇺🇸 (7.3k followers) 1 days ago · 66 likes · 4.7k views · view the original post on X. Kept by the AI Radar as Frontier models.
More AI work like this
- 🚨 STEALTH CHECKPOINT ALERT: Google is A/B testing Gemini 4 "Hydrogen" on LMArena… — @StatsWire
- Built a 100% procedural molten pāhoehoe lava simulation in Three.js using Gemini 4 Argon… — @thebuggeddev
- Coding tasks are saturated. So why is everyone still paying for the most expensive model… — @guilleflorvs
- What happens if Anthropic doesn't ship a new model for 6 months? — @guilleflorvs
- GPT-6 Cyber beats GPT-6 Astra on cybersecurity. — @adnaannasir_
- Can you see that dot right there in the top right? — @airesearch12
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen is currently testing on arena under the name gemini-3.8-flash and it's… — @thtbee_
- Gpt -6.2-Astra对比Gpt-6-Astra的前端之云上龙城：（从蛇变龙） — @leo114119
Every post is read and classified by AGK Intelligence: what it is, which market it belongs to, and whether the link is a real tool. 65.5k posts from 5k X accounts over the last 14 days, 10.4k tools, 19 markets. New posts are collected several times an hour and the full ranking is recomputed every hour — last update 2026-11-06 16:50 UTC. Full method.