AI Radar
Support
LiveUpdated 2026-11-06 16:50 UTC

💡Finally, some numbers. Here is the score some of us waiting for.

💡Finally, some numbers. Here is the score some of us waiting for. How good is Nanbeige4.3 compared to Qwen3.8-27B?…

This is a AI post classified by AGK Intelligence as Open & local models (a model release), kept by the AI Radar because it carries real work, not commentary.

💡Finally, some numbers. Here is the score some of us waiting for. How good is Nanbeige4.3 compared to Qwen3.8-27B? 🎯Nanbeige4.3-33B beat Qwen3.8-27B on several of its own benchmarks ... and now Artificial Analysis has independently tested it. The result? 🔥 Nanbeige4.3-33B → 20 🔥 Qwen3.8-27B (xhigh) → 20 ⚪ Muse Glimmer 30B → 6 A new challenger has matched Qwen3.8-27B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5. But look at where Nanbeige wins ... Terminal-Bench 4.0 🚀 Nanbeige → 30% 🔵 Qwen3.8 → 6% CritPt v2 Hard (physics) 🚀 Nanbeige → 16% 🔵 Qwen3.8 → 4% AutomationBench-AA 🚀 Nanbeige

Posted by David Hendrickson (12.8k followers) 10 h ago · 18 likes · 3k views · view the original post on X. Kept by the AI Radar as Open & local models.

More AI work like this

Every post is read and classified by AGK Intelligence: what it is, which market it belongs to, and whether the link is a real tool. 65.5k posts from 5k X accounts over the last 14 days, 10.4k tools, 19 markets. New posts are collected several times an hour and the full ranking is recomputed every hour — last update 2026-11-06 16:50 UTC. Full method.