How much better is each internal model getting at Anthropic?
This is a AI post classified by AGK Intelligence as Frontier models (a model release), kept by the AI Radar because it carries real work, not commentary.
How much better is each internal model getting at Anthropic? Model 2: - 174.1 Model 3: - 177.0 (+2.9 points) Model 4: - 178.6 (+1.6 points) That’s a 4.5-point increase from Model 2 to Model 4. Model 2 and 3 are estimates read from METR’s chart. Keep in mind this is AECI, not Epoch’s ECI They use different methods, so we can’t tell from this whether their ECI scores would be higher. Even if you assume Model 4 is Fable 5.5, the changes are about 1.7% and 0.9% of the index scores, but AECI uses an arbitrary scale. For reference Astra scores 169 on the ECI
Posted by Chris (72.4k followers) 44 min ago · 16 likes · 1.8k views · view the original post on X. Kept by the AI Radar as Frontier models.
More AI work like this
- BREAKING: GROK BOT can POST on your X account now! — @nima_owji
- Qwen 4 preview 4 stroke engine — @loktar00
- From fun idea → functional smart device 🏄♂️ — @Google
- These are the best demos I've ever seen, 45 seconds of pure brilliance. Finally some… — @0xSero
- Gemini 4 Carbon was given a 3D seaplane prompt and built an infinite ocean with… — @RoundtableSpace
- BREAKING: OpenAI just scored agents on the messy part of science. — @guilleflorvs
- Yesterday, the first details regarding Anthropic's internal models were published. — @kimmonismus
- Congratulations to Qwen3.8-27B, it beats all models including the top SOTA models from… — @TeksEdge
Every post is read and classified by AGK Intelligence: what it is, which market it belongs to, and whether the link is a real tool. 65.2k posts from 5k X accounts over the last 14 days, 10.5k tools, 19 markets. New posts are collected several times an hour and the full ranking is recomputed every hour — last update 2026-11-06 21:51 UTC. Full method.